Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA)
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About

 NEWS & UPDATES

A Pattern for Privacy

8/14/2026

 
Picture
Franklin Delano Roosevelt likened the motley coalition supporting his opponent in the 1940 election to a chameleon.

The president joked:

“We all know the story of the unfortunate chameleon, which turned brown when placed on a brown rug, and turned red when placed on a red rug, but who died a tragic death when they put him on a Scotch plaid.”

Plaid, in actuality, is never fatal, though it has been known to kill the vibes for a few first dates. There is, however, a new use for plaid in the 21st century. With millions of cameras embedded in doorbells and suspended over streets and highways, plaid may just be the fashion accessory for the privacy-conscious.

The power of plaid has been discovered by a security researcher, who seems to have found a way to make people and vehicles less visible to the algorithms behind surveillance cameras.

As Zack Whittaker of TechCrunch reports, Bill Swearingen’s “noRecognition” project uses computer-generated patterns to confuse automated detection systems. After some 31 million tests, his model produced patterns that defeated 11 open-source algorithms, including software used by Flock license-plate readers, Axon body cameras, and Clearview AI.

At the recent DEF CON cybersecurity conference in Las Vegas, a car wrapped in one of Swearingen’s patterns evaded detection from a Flock camera. These patterns, however, do not stop cameras from recording. They merely prevent algorithms from recognizing and flagging people, faces, or vehicles. Swearingen calls these patterns a way to “opt out of being tracked.”

It is an ingenious response to a troubling reality: Although we never agreed to it, we are increasingly subjected to automated surveillance that tracks us wherever we go, with the potential to record our associations and activities.
​
Who knows? If people start wearing these patterns, maybe surveillance algorithms will crawl across our images and die.

    STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to Newsletter
DONATE & HELP US DEFEND YOUR FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    2025 Year In Review
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Biometric Data
    Call To Action
    Congress
    Congressional Hearings
    Congressional Unmasking
    Court Appeals
    Court Hearings
    Court Rulings
    Data Privacy
    Digital Privacy
    Domestic Surveillance
    Due Process
    Facial Recognition
    FISA
    FISA Reform
    FOIA Requests
    Foreign Surveillance
    Fourth Amendment
    Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    Government Surveillance
    Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA)
    Insights
    In The Media
    Lawsuits
    Legal
    Legislation
    Letters To Congress
    NDO Fairness Act
    News
    Opinion
    Podcast
    PPSA Amicus Briefs
    Private Data Brokers
    Protect Liberty Act (PLEWSA)
    Saving Privacy Act
    SCOTUS
    SCOTUS Rulings
    Section 702
    Spyware
    Stingrays
    Surveillance Issues
    Surveillance Technology
    The GSRA
    The SAFE Act
    The White House
    Warrantless Searches
    Watching The Watchers

    RSS Feed

FOLLOW PPSA: 
© COPYRIGHT 2026. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | PRIVACY STATEMENT
Photo from coffee-rank