Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA)
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE

 NEWS & UPDATES

No, Majority Leader Thune, FISA Section 702 Is Not “Dark for the First Time Ever”

7/28/2026

 
Picture
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD)
As the U.S. Senate prepares to finalize the confirmation of Jay Clayton as Director of National Intelligence, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) scored some partisan points about the Democrats’ disdain for Acting Director Bill Pulte.

The senator said:

“Democrats were so worked up over the president's temporary choice for this position, they allowed our nation’s most important counterterrorism tool to go dark for the first time ever.”

​This was a reference to the ongoing debate – and delayed vote – on the reauthorization of Section 702, the authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that allows U.S. intelligence agencies to surveil foreign threats on foreign soil, but has often been used to examine the communications of American citizens on American soil who are not suspected of any wrongdoing.

It is true that the deadline for Section 702’s reauthorization has come and gone. But the important – and vital – task of surveilling foreign threats and terrorists has not stopped. All that has happened is that the authority’s statute has expired. Its surveillance programs continue to operate under court orders that allow intelligence collection to continue until March 2027.

We have that much time – until the spring of next year – to debate reasonable guardrails that can curtail the program’s rampant surveillance of American citizens. There is no reason to stiff-arm all debate about reform amendments. This surveillance authority was never intended to spy on Americans when Congress enacted it to track foreign threats.
​

Section 702 is not “dark for the first time ever.” Nor do we expect it ever to be. We have the luxury of time to hold a fulsome debate over how Section 702 is used and misused – and the best ways to improve it.

    STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to Newsletter
DONATE & HELP US DEFEND YOUR FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    2025 Year In Review
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Biometric Data
    Call To Action
    Congress
    Congressional Hearings
    Congressional Unmasking
    Court Appeals
    Court Hearings
    Court Rulings
    Data Privacy
    Digital Privacy
    Domestic Surveillance
    Due Process
    Facial Recognition
    FISA
    FISA Reform
    FOIA Requests
    Foreign Surveillance
    Fourth Amendment
    Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    Government Surveillance
    Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA)
    Insights
    In The Media
    Lawsuits
    Legal
    Legislation
    Letters To Congress
    NDO Fairness Act
    News
    Opinion
    Podcast
    PPSA Amicus Briefs
    Private Data Brokers
    Protect Liberty Act (PLEWSA)
    Saving Privacy Act
    SCOTUS
    SCOTUS Rulings
    Section 702
    Spyware
    Stingrays
    Surveillance Issues
    Surveillance Technology
    The GSRA
    The SAFE Act
    The White House
    Warrantless Searches
    Watching The Watchers

    RSS Feed

FOLLOW PPSA: 
© COPYRIGHT 2026. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | PRIVACY STATEMENT
Photo from coffee-rank