Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA)
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE

 NEWS & UPDATES

Watching the Watchers: Former NSA Employee on Flock Cameras: “Real and Palpable Damage to Citizenry”

8/5/2025

 
Picture
On April 8, the Board of Scarsdale Village, New York, approved a $2.1 million contract with Flock Safety to bring mass camera surveillance to its community.
 
Many residents of Scarsdale, the wealthiest suburb in the United States, were disturbed by the apparent contravention of the Board’s rules, giving no advance notice or allowing any public comment before voting 6-1 vote to approve the contract. Many of its residents are deeply troubled about the implications of Flock Safety camera surveillance, which enables AI-powered license plate readers to follow residents in their daily travels.
 
Jessica Burbank followed this story on Drop Site News, writing: “Flock is a $7.5 billion surveillance technology company, operating in over 5,000 communities across 49 states. Flock has a proven playbook to expand through securing local government contracts, often behind closed doors.”
 
Burbank reports on the public comments of Scarsdale resident Charles Seife, a former employee of the National Security Agency, who said:
 
“The system that Scarsdale wishes to implement is extremely dangerous … The records are kept for several weeks. At the very least, they allow retroactive surveillance. These systems are immensely popular with politicians and law enforcement, even though they do real and palpable damage to the citizenry …
 
“We're creating that database so that we can always do that for anyone, that you're constantly tracking people's movements. You have that system in place so that you don't need to articulate the suspicion before you're gathering that on someone, before you're actually trying to tag someone with wrongdoing. When you have that system there, all someone has to do is say, I don't like that person. And then you've got that surveillance already established.”
 
Seife later told Drop Site News: “Freedoms don't come back and privacy doesn't come back, and we are taking these irreversible steps so blithely for no real reason.”
 
Another Scarsdale resident, Josh Frankel, said: “The way I see it, it is not a matter of if this data will be abused and misused, only a matter of when and by whom.”

    STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to Newsletter
DONATE & HELP US PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    2025 Year In Review
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Biometric Data
    Call To Action
    Congress
    Congressional Hearings
    Congressional Unmasking
    Court Appeals
    Court Hearings
    Court Rulings
    Data Privacy
    Digital Privacy
    Domestic Surveillance
    Due Process
    Facial Recognition
    FISA
    FISA Reform
    FOIA Requests
    Foreign Surveillance
    Fourth Amendment
    Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    Government Surveillance
    Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA)
    Insights
    In The Media
    Lawsuits
    Legal
    Legislation
    Letters To Congress
    NDO Fairness Act
    News
    Opinion
    Podcast
    PPSA Amicus Briefs
    Private Data Brokers
    Protect Liberty Act (PLEWSA)
    Saving Privacy Act
    SCOTUS
    SCOTUS Rulings
    Section 702
    Spyware
    Stingrays
    Surveillance Issues
    Surveillance Technology
    The GSRA
    The SAFE Act
    The White House
    Warrantless Searches
    Watching The Watchers

    RSS Feed

FOLLOW PPSA: 
© COPYRIGHT 2026. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | PRIVACY STATEMENT
Photo from coffee-rank