Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA)
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE

 NEWS & UPDATES

Congress Should Require DIA to Reveal Extent of its Collection of Americans’ Personal Information

3/31/2022

 
Picture
Many government agencies get around the Fourth Amendment’s requirement for a probable cause warrant by simply buying our personal information from data brokers. Now there is a move for government’s biggest agency – the Department of Defense – to come clean on what kinds of our personal information is on its shopping list.
 
Every American should care about the sale of our data because it is, in effect, selling parts of our lives and those of people we love.
 
Your digital portrait tells us about your race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, and how much money you make. It tells us if you’ve gotten divorced or engaged. It tells us if you are pregnant. It tells us if you have diabetes or take a pharmaceutical to combat depression. It reveals your politics and intimate facts about your family. Our digital portraits effortlessly assemble in an instant more than a private detective could discover in a week. It is hard to imagine a more intrusive and personal portfolio.
 
One set of facts being sold in our digital portfolios by data brokers is our location history: where we’ve been with a cellphone in our pocket. The U.S. Supreme Court held in Carpenter (2018) that government acquisition of cell-site records is a Fourth Amendment search, usually requiring a warrant.
 
That is why we were surprised to learn in January, 2021, that the lawyers for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) within DOD had come to the conclusion that the agency may legally purchase Americans’ smartphone location histories – in bulk – from brokers, who in turn extract that information from our smartphone apps. But DIA’s lawyers say it need not conform to Carpenter because it is not seizing our data.
 
It is merely buying it. See the distinction? Neither do we.
 
Now there is an organized push by civil liberties groups to insert into the federal budget a requirement that the DIA report to the public and congressional defense committees a topline report on what kinds of records it collects. The report should include the numbers of domestic phone calls, domestic text messages, and domestic internet metadata, including Americans’ online search histories collected by DIA. 
 
The idea that the federal government can defeat the Fourth Amendment by simply opening its wallet is preposterous. At the very least, Congress should shine a bright light on the extent of this practice by DIA and other agencies.

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Call To Action
    Congress
    Congressional Hearings
    Congressional Unmasking
    Court Appeals
    Court Hearings
    Court Rulings
    Digital Privacy
    Domestic Surveillance
    Facial Recognition
    FISA
    FISA Reform
    FOIA Requests
    Foreign Surveillance
    Fourth Amendment
    Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    Government Surveillance
    Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA)
    Insights
    In The Media
    Lawsuits
    Legal
    Legislation
    Letters To Congress
    NDO Fairness Act
    News
    Opinion
    Podcast
    PPSA Amicus Briefs
    Private Data Brokers
    Protect Liberty Act (PLEWSA)
    Saving Privacy Act
    SCOTUS
    SCOTUS Rulings
    Section 702
    Spyware
    Stingrays
    Surveillance Issues
    Surveillance Technology
    The GSRA
    The SAFE Act
    Warrantless Searches
    Watching The Watchers

    RSS Feed

FOLLOW PPSA: 
© COPYRIGHT 2024. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | PRIVACY STATEMENT
Photo from coffee-rank