Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA)
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE

 NEWS & UPDATES

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Appeal to D.C. Circuit Court Challenges Government’s “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Responses

4/24/2020

 
​WASHINGTON – Gene Schaerr, general counsel of the Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA), today notified the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that the federal government cannot duck its disclosure obligations under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by issuing boilerplate “neither confirm nor deny” responses.
 
“It turns out that the emperor has been naked all along,” said Schaerr. “The whole doctrine is legally suspect.”
 
PPSA has used FOIA requests to press the CIA, NSA, ODNI, Department of Justice, and Department of State to provide information about whether the U.S. intelligence community illegally spied on the Trump campaign and transition team. These agencies have largely evaded PPSA’s requests by relying on so-called Glomar responses, a judicial invention allowing such agencies to respond to FOIA requests by claiming that they can “neither confirm nor deny” even the existence of the requested information.
 
“The D.C. federal district court recently approved these agencies’ ability to issue Glomar responses to FOIA requests,” Schaerr said. “We have a strong basis to challenge the court’s application of the Glomar doctrine, even its validity.”
 
The filing of a statement of issues notified the court that the appeal will include the issue of whether government agencies “could lawfully rely on the judicially created Glomar doctrine to satisfy their statutory disclosure obligations” under FOIA.
 
Issuing “neither confirm nor deny” responses has become standard practice among intelligence agencies. PPSA will urge the courts not to apply the Glomar doctrine beyond its bare requirements, and if necessary will challenge Glomar itself as an inappropriate judicial amendment to the government’s FOIA obligations.
 
“The U.S. Supreme Court has never had the occasion to deeply examine this widely used doctrine to evade the legal requirement for disclosure,” Schaerr said. “We hope the Court of Appeals will comply with Congress’s direction on freedom of information disclosures. If it doesn’t, we’re prepared to appeal to the Supreme Court.”
CONTACT GENE SCHAERR >>>

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Call To Action
    Congress
    Congressional Hearings
    Congressional Unmasking
    Court Appeals
    Court Hearings
    Court Rulings
    Digital Privacy
    Domestic Surveillance
    Facial Recognition
    FISA
    FISA Reform
    FOIA Requests
    Foreign Surveillance
    Fourth Amendment
    Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    Government Surveillance
    Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA)
    Insights
    In The Media
    Lawsuits
    Legal
    Legislation
    Letters To Congress
    NDO Fairness Act
    News
    Opinion
    Podcast
    PPSA Amicus Briefs
    Private Data Brokers
    Protect Liberty Act (PLEWSA)
    Saving Privacy Act
    SCOTUS
    SCOTUS Rulings
    Section 702
    Spyware
    Stingrays
    Surveillance Issues
    Surveillance Technology
    The GSRA
    The SAFE Act
    Warrantless Searches
    Watching The Watchers

    RSS Feed

FOLLOW PPSA: 
© COPYRIGHT 2024. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | PRIVACY STATEMENT
Photo from coffee-rank