Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA)
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • PRESS Act
    • Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    • Over 3 Million Searches
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • PRESS Act
    • Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    • Over 3 Million Searches

 NEWS & UPDATES

Judge Jackson Seems to Embrace Broad, Originalist Meaning for Fourth Amendment

3/22/2022

 
Picture
In her confirmation hearing today, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson spoke approvingly of two Supreme Court decisions on whether the Fourth Amendment applies to cellphones. Her answer seems to reveal a lot about the judge’s thinking about privacy, surveillance, and how she might interpret the U.S. Constitution.
 
In Riley v. California (2014), the Court was asked if a cellphone – which, of course, did not exist at the time of the drafting of the Constitution – is protected by the Fourth Amendment requirement for a probable cause warrant. The Court held that cellphones “are now such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life that the proverbial visitor from Mars might conclude that they were an important feature of human anatomy.” The Court also noted that cellphones hold the “sum of an individual’s private life.”
 
In Carpenter v. United States (2018), the Court determined that a warrant is needed to access a person’s cellphone location history.
 
Judge Jackson brought up both decisions when Sen. Amy Klobuchar asked her about extending the Constitution to fit new realities. The judge’s reply had more of an originalist flavor than that of Sen. Klobuchar’s question. Judge Jackson said the Supreme Court correctly “looked back at the time of the Founding” at how the definition of unreasonable searches and seizures “would have been understood at the time,” and then applied that understanding to the new technology at issue in those cases.
 
Her reply gives hope to those who would want a Justice Jackson to give the Fourth Amendment a broad, originalist reading

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    Analysis
    Call To Action
    Congress
    Congressional Hearings
    Congressional Unmasking
    Court Hearings
    Court Rulings
    Digital Privacy
    Facial Recognition
    FISA
    FOIA Requests
    Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    Government Surveillance
    Insights
    In The Media
    Lawsuits
    Legislation
    News
    Opinion
    Podcast
    PPSA Amicus Briefs
    Private Data Brokers
    SCOTUS
    SCOTUS Rulings
    Spyware
    Stingrays
    Surveillance Issues
    Surveillance Technology

    RSS Feed

© COPYRIGHT 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | PRIVACY STATEMENT