Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA)
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE

 NEWS & UPDATES

PPSA Cites ODNI Admission in FOIA Appeal: Does Intelligence Community Evasiveness Mean It Has Spied on Members of Congress?

7/23/2020

 
​PPSA today cited a recent admission by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to demand disclosure by that agency on whether or not the intelligence community has been surveilling past and current Senators and U.S. House Members.
 
On Jan. 28, PPSA had filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to ODNI, asking it to reveal whether U.S. intelligence has unmasked the identities of current and past Members of Congress known to have been caught up in foreign surveillance, and whether the names of these members were searched through ODNI databases (a practice known as “upstreaming”). The request covered 48 current and former Members in both parties and their potential surveillance from Jan. 1, 2008 to Jan. 15, 2020.
 
On Feb. 4, ODNI summarily denied PPSA’s request with a “Glomar response” (neither confirming nor denying the existence of such records) because it said an answer “could reveal sources and methods information.”
 
PPSA today supplemented its appeal of that denial, pointing to a recent admission by former Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell. One day after receiving a letter from several U.S. Senators, Grenell disclosed a list of officials who might have been involved in the unmasking of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.
 
On May 25, in a piquant letter to Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Grenell wrote:
 
“As you well know, the decision to declassify the names of individuals who sought to unmask the identity of General Flynn poses absolutely no risk of compromise of either sources or methods.”
 
“If that is true of General Flynn,” said PPSA’s general counsel Gene Schaerr, “then it’s also true of the Senators and Congressmen who we believe were unmasked by the intelligence community.” Schaerr added, “Thanks to the forthright statements of former Acting Director Grenell, we now know that the ODNI’s denial in our case was not to protect intelligence sources or methods. Is this denial designed instead to protect one or more agencies from embarrassment or even from highlighting a violation of the law?”
 
PPSA will continue to report responses from ODNI concerning this FOIA request.

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Call To Action
    Congress
    Congressional Hearings
    Congressional Unmasking
    Court Appeals
    Court Hearings
    Court Rulings
    Digital Privacy
    Domestic Surveillance
    Facial Recognition
    FISA
    FISA Reform
    FOIA Requests
    Foreign Surveillance
    Fourth Amendment
    Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    Government Surveillance
    Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA)
    Insights
    In The Media
    Lawsuits
    Legal
    Legislation
    Letters To Congress
    NDO Fairness Act
    News
    Opinion
    Podcast
    PPSA Amicus Briefs
    Private Data Brokers
    Protect Liberty Act (PLEWSA)
    Saving Privacy Act
    SCOTUS
    SCOTUS Rulings
    Section 702
    Spyware
    Stingrays
    Surveillance Issues
    Surveillance Technology
    The GSRA
    The SAFE Act
    Warrantless Searches
    Watching The Watchers

    RSS Feed

FOLLOW PPSA: 
© COPYRIGHT 2024. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | PRIVACY STATEMENT
Photo from coffee-rank