Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA)
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE

 NEWS & UPDATES

PPSA Files Appeal to Force Agencies to Disclose Political Unmasking

1/14/2022

 
Picture
The Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability today announced the filing of an appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, challenging the refusal of six government agencies to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking information on the surveillance of campaign and transition officials in the 2016 election.

“We ask the court to understand that judicial doctrine is being distorted into a cover-up of alarming misbehavior by the U.S. intelligence community,” said Gene Schaerr, general counsel of PPSA. “Americans deserve to know if our government has used its sweeping surveillance authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) as a political weapon wielded against the campaign and presidential transition team of an opposing party.

“However you feel about the candidate in question, Donald Trump, what was done to him in 2016 can be done by an administration of either party in a future election,” Schaerr said.

The genesis of the issue was the surveillance of Trump campaign aide Carter Page, which Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz later investigated and found 17 “significant errors” and omissions in filings before the FISA Court. An FBI attorney was later convicted of introducing falsified evidence before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in that case. It later came to light that Obama Administration UN Ambassador Samantha Power, a political appointee and not an intelligence official, “unmasked” the identities of American citizens incidentally caught up in warrantless foreign surveillance more than 260 times. Over a 12-month period between 2015 and 2016 the Obama Administration unmasked 9,217 persons. Nor did this practice end with the election of Donald Trump, whose administration saw 16,721 unmaskings in 2018.

FOIA requests filed with the Department of Justice, the FBI, CIA, National Security Agency, Department of State and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence sought records regarding the unmasking and “upstreaming” (the interception of internet communications) of people, including Members of Congress, who were affiliated with the Trump campaign and transition. Each agency issued a “Glomar” response that refused to confirm or deny the existence of such records.

PPSA’s appeal challenges the government’s expansive interpretation of Glomar as a doctrine that “not only forbids the disclosure of such fundamental wrongdoing but does not even permit a preliminary search for such safely disclosable records.”

PPSA’s filing informs the court of a deep contradiction in the government’s case: “Because the government’s searchless responses failed to rule out the likelihood of finding those unprotected records, those responses cannot shield them from their FOIA-mandated duties to search for and disclose any such records.”

PPSA concludes that that the prospect of political surveillance “should be a question of deep concern to any American regardless of political ideology or affiliation.”
​
For all these reasons, PPSA asks the court to vacate the district court’s grant of summary judgment and order the defendants to search for and disclose records regarding the unmasking and upstreaming of American citizens involved in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Call To Action
    Congress
    Congressional Hearings
    Congressional Unmasking
    Court Appeals
    Court Hearings
    Court Rulings
    Digital Privacy
    Domestic Surveillance
    Facial Recognition
    FISA
    FISA Reform
    FOIA Requests
    Foreign Surveillance
    Fourth Amendment
    Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    Government Surveillance
    Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA)
    Insights
    In The Media
    Lawsuits
    Legal
    Legislation
    Letters To Congress
    NDO Fairness Act
    News
    Opinion
    Podcast
    PPSA Amicus Briefs
    Private Data Brokers
    Protect Liberty Act (PLEWSA)
    Saving Privacy Act
    SCOTUS
    SCOTUS Rulings
    Section 702
    Spyware
    Stingrays
    Surveillance Issues
    Surveillance Technology
    The GSRA
    The SAFE Act
    Warrantless Searches
    Watching The Watchers

    RSS Feed

FOLLOW PPSA: 
© COPYRIGHT 2024. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | PRIVACY STATEMENT
Photo from coffee-rank