Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability (PPSA)
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE
  • Issues
  • Solutions
  • SCORECARD
    • Congressional Scorecard Rubric
  • News
  • About
  • TAKE ACTION
    • Section 702 Reform
    • PRESS Act
    • DONATE

 NEWS & UPDATES

PPSA's Bob Goodlatte Applauds NDO Fairness Act

3/15/2022

 
Picture
Sensitive information about our health, financial transactions, and personal relationships can easily be extracted from the cloud. Prosecutors often request a person’s phone calls, emails and other records to gather evidence. Some targets are investigated for prosecution. Many such targets are, however, bystanders caught up in their proximity to an investigation.

When such surveillance occurs, prosecutors often request a Non-Disclosure Order (NDO), which prohibits digital and telecom service providers from notifying their customers about the search. Those who have been investigated will never challenge such an order in court because they will never know it happened.
 
How extensive is this practice? Prosecutors execute electronic search warrants accompanied by non-disclosure orders thousands of times each year.
 
Bob Goodlatte, PPSA Senior Policy Advisor and former Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, congratulated the current chairman, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI) for introducing the NDO Fairness Act.
 
“As we’ve seen time and again, government will find loopholes in the law and widen them. Chairman Nadler and Rep. Fitzgerald are taking the initiative to close one loophole that has evolved into a serious encroachment of Americans’ privacy. Placing these prosecutorial powers within the guardrail of disclosure would be a major step in protecting our due process rights.”
 
This bill amends the law to require a written determination from a court finding that the non-disclosure order is necessary to prevent a “substantially likely adverse result.”
 
It directs courts to provide strict scrutiny for gag order requests. It limits these gag orders to 30 days, with possible extensions. And it requires notice to be given to a customer within 72 hours of the expiration of the deadline, including details on the information disclosed. Finally, the NDO Fairness Act gives Americans standing to contest a gag order in court.

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    2022 Year In Review
    2023 Year In Review
    2024 Year In Review
    Analysis
    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Call To Action
    Congress
    Congressional Hearings
    Congressional Unmasking
    Court Appeals
    Court Hearings
    Court Rulings
    Digital Privacy
    Domestic Surveillance
    Facial Recognition
    FISA
    FISA Reform
    FOIA Requests
    Foreign Surveillance
    Fourth Amendment
    Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
    Government Surveillance
    Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA)
    Insights
    In The Media
    Lawsuits
    Legal
    Legislation
    Letters To Congress
    NDO Fairness Act
    News
    Opinion
    Podcast
    PPSA Amicus Briefs
    Private Data Brokers
    Protect Liberty Act (PLEWSA)
    Saving Privacy Act
    SCOTUS
    SCOTUS Rulings
    Section 702
    Spyware
    Stingrays
    Surveillance Issues
    Surveillance Technology
    The GSRA
    The SAFE Act
    Warrantless Searches
    Watching The Watchers

    RSS Feed

FOLLOW PPSA: 
© COPYRIGHT 2024. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | PRIVACY STATEMENT
Photo from coffee-rank